Technical SEO is the least glamorous and highest-leverage work in search. Most sites we audit are wasting the majority of their crawl budget on pages that should never have been indexed.
No mystery line items. Here is exactly what we do and why each part earns its place.
Full crawl mapped against Search Console coverage data to find what Google sees, skips and quietly drops.
LCP, INP and CLS diagnosed at template level, with specific fixes handed to your developers — or implemented by ours.
We compare rendered against raw HTML to catch content and links that never reach the index on JS-heavy sites.
Server logs show where Googlebot actually spends its time. It is frequently nowhere near your important pages.
Organisation, Product, Article, FAQ, LocalBusiness and Breadcrumb schema, validated and monitored for errors.
Redesigning or replatforming? We map redirects, hold a pre-launch checklist and monitor daily for two weeks after go-live.
Full site crawl, rendered and raw, cross-referenced with Search Console and log files.
Every issue rated by traffic impact and engineering effort so nothing gets fixed in the wrong order.
We hand over developer-ready tickets, or our own developers do the work if you would rather not queue it internally.
Scheduled crawls with alerts, so the fixes stay fixed after the next deploy.
Yes. We have front-end developers in-house and regularly work inside client repositories or CMSs to ship the fixes ourselves.
It is a real but modest ranking signal. The bigger effect is on conversion — a site that loads in 2 seconds instead of 6 converts meaningfully better regardless of Google.
Before the build, not after. Migration damage is far cheaper to prevent than to recover from. Most traffic losses we are asked to fix were avoidable.